<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Strategy &#187; Mobile Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m-strat.org/category/mobile-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m-strat.org</link>
	<description>... understanding and navigating the mobile ecosystem.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:37:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Application Development: Native or Browser</title>
		<link>http://m-strat.org/mobile-application-development-native-or-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://m-strat.org/mobile-application-development-native-or-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jose HC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Worker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m-strat.org/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The discussion rages on. I continue to enjoy the experience of native applications much more. But there seem to be a lot of people out there jumping on the &#8216;mobile browser application&#8216; bandwagon. Of course everyone has a reason for it but if we focus solely on the end user (how about that?) the native [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The discussion rages on.  I continue to enjoy the experience of native applications much more.  But there seem to be a lot of people out there jumping on the &#8216;<em>mobile browser application</em>&#8216; bandwagon.  Of course everyone has a reason for it but if we focus solely on the end user (how about that?) the native applications provide a richer and better experience (not to mention better integration with device functionality).  Inside the enterprise (as we attempt to mobilize our workers) this argument hasn&#8217;t taken off just yet.  This is mostly because it adds a layer of complexity (and costs) to the roll out and support of multiple devices and platforms.</p>
<p>For now, I leave you with two stories:</p>
<li><a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/09/10/mobilize-the-browser-as-the-unifier/">From GigaOm</a>: <strong>The Browser as the Unifier</strong><br />
A small post and a video from an interview&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>The biggest complaint coming from mobile developers is that there are just too many darn cell phone platforms and devices for which they need to create applications. Compared to the dozens of platforms in the cell phone world, developing applications for PCs is a breeze. But until the cell phone world gets a whole lot simpler, there’s an answer to all that confusion, says Jon von Tetzchner, co-Founder and CEO of Opera Software: the browser.</p></blockquote>
</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cloudfour.com/459/the-five-most-common-arguments-for-native-iphone-development/">From Jason Grigsby of Cloud Four</a>: <strong>The Five Most Common Arguments for Native iPhone Development</strong></li>
<p>Jason presents and refutes the most common arguments for why iPhone applications need to be built using native code instead of web technology.</p>
<blockquote><p>Three of the arguments either don’t apply in all cases or are simply wrong.</p>
<p>The five most common arguments for native app development are:<br />
1. Offline Mode — The ability to continue to use an application when you are not connected to the Internet.<br />
2. Findability — If you’re not in the App Store, people won’t be able to find your application.<br />
3. Performance — Javascript on mobile is too slow to use for application development.<br />
4. Device Attributes — The need to access things like the camera, gps and the accelerometer.<br />
5. Monetization — The ease with which people can and will buy your application.</p>
<p>These five reasons are also provided to argue for native app development on other platforms like Android and Blackberry as well.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Now It&#8217;s Your Turn</strong><br />
Regardless of the number of visitors to the <a href="http://m-strat.org">Mobile Strategy</a> Blog we always have a tough time collecting opinions and commentary.  Not sure if it has to do with our style or with our readers&#8230; But we do value your opinion and we would like to hear your thoughts on this topic (and all the others of course).  So please drop us a line or leave a comment below:</p>
<p>	     &#8211; What are your thoughts?<br />
	     &#8211; Are these arguments one-sided?<br />
	     &#8211; What are you developing for?<strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/making-sense-of-mobile-application-development/" rel="bookmark" title="September 29, 2009">Making Sense of Mobile Application Development</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/collection-of-tiny-mobile-apps-for-your-iphone/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2009">Collection of tiny mobile apps for your iPhone (or my Personalized Enterprise Gateway)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/iphone-and-enterprise-mobility/" rel="bookmark" title="November 29, 2008">iPhone and Enterprise Mobility</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/mobile-applications-and-loyalty/" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2009">Mobile Applications and Loyalty</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/13-things-to-remember-when-integrating-mobility-or-how-to-avoid-process-peddlers/" rel="bookmark" title="December 9, 2009">13 Things To Remember When Integrating Mobility (Or How To Avoid Process Peddlers)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/mobile-strategy-and-the-ipod-touch/" rel="bookmark" title="July 20, 2009">Mobile Strategy and the iPod Touch</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/app-store-market-data-from-appsfire/" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2009">App Store Market Data (from AppsFire)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/mobile-20-cloud/" rel="bookmark" title="November 22, 2008">Mobile 2.0 Cloud</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/content-on-its-way/" rel="bookmark" title="October 31, 2008">Content On Its Way</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m-strat.org/mobile-search-now-with-video-yellowpages-ca-iphone-app-updated/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2009">Mobile Search Now With Video &#8211; YellowPages.ca iPhone App Updated</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 8.790 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://m-strat.org/mobile-application-development-native-or-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
