I have always been excited by massive change.   As a high school and undergraduate student I loved to read about historical turning points, revolutions, political upheavals … where things were turned upside down and the system/structure/government that was left in its place was completely different from what had been there before.

It would appear that we can no longer hope for such monumental changes in the mobile space.  No longer is mobility something we hope for.  No longer is it something we dream about.  It is so much a part of our every day lives that we are even taking it for granted.

But is it really that much a part of our lives?  I would argue that true mobility (read mobile enablement) has not yet penetrated the enterprise.  In many ways mobility has been kept outside of the enterprise fortress.  It is the last bastion to be conquered in 2012.  The extension of email and calendaring is not true mobile enablement.

In 2012 we will see the enterprise mobility space reshaped.  Long dominated by the BlackBerry Enterprise Solution by the end of 2012 the mobile enterprise will look very different than what it does today.  Do not think that this monumental change will start on January 1st … it started a few years ago.  Palm, Good Technology and Research In Motion all paved the way for what will happen in 2012.   As old devices come up for a refresh and the pent-up demand for functionality increases IT departments everywhere will be forced to seriously consider opening the doors to true mobility.

Enterprise mobility is about extending the enterprise to mobile employees where ever they are on a wide variety of devices.  This can be done securely and efficiently through the many mobile device management solutions out there (i.e Afaria and the future BES/Ubitexx combo among others).  If the enterprise stops only at the device management aspect of it they will completely miss the boat and it can not in good conscience be called ‘enterprise mobility.’  On top of managing the devices you will need to provide access to critical enterprise applications as well as some consumer apps available through the app stores (or all – depending on your security concerns).  Speaking of app stores you will also need to decide  how will control and to whom you will distribute each mobile app – you can also do this with an internal enterprise mobile application store.

In 2012 the enterprise will truly become mobile.  The key term mobile strategy (or mobility strategy) will begin to be identified more and more with your enterprise mobile strategy (roadmap) as much as it has been over the last few years with your approach to your market through the mobile channel.

 

{ 2 comments }

{ 0 comments }

I have been thinking about this difference the last few days. Some people use the terms interchangeably as if they mean the same thing. They don’t mean the same thing… I am still cementing my thoughts on these differences but I think it is a good exercise for all of us if we are able to go deeper into the meaning of each.

What do think? Is there a difference? Are they referring to the same thing? Or different things?

{ 6 comments }

First of all let me tell you something that has been heavily on my mind over the last week or so – RIM is NOT Nortel.  I will write more about that later on, but I believe that Research In Motion and its BlackBerry line of products and services has a long life left in them.  This is not an obituary.  We are just taking a break from mobility to think about our friends and the lives being affected one way or another by the ‘reset’ that RIM is going through right now.

It has been 4 days since Research In Motion announced a large scale reorganization, the retirement of Don Morrison and 2,000 layoffs.  The news, however, did not hit home until late Tuesday afternoon when I first got wind of the names of some of those being let go.  The folks released are far more senior than I originally anticipated.  It definitely hit home because I worked very closely with ‘some’ of those people in my past.  If you check LinkedIn you can already see profile changes and people who were previously inactive are much more active now.

Prior to my current role, and before and after my time at RIM, I worked in large-scale reorganizations, layoffs and process re-engineering.  One thing I can tell you is that the tension will always be present in this type of situation.

It is inevitable; it is unavoidable.  It is part of the process.

I have seen and personally tried all kinds of ‘change management’ techniques and at the end of the day there are always casualties far beyond the actual people that are let go.  What RIM is going through right now is painful; very painful.  And it is ugly.  Very ugly – especially on a personal and human level.

But it was necessary.  The market changed. Competition became real.  If you are a current employee this may even be impossible for you to understand – but if this is executed correctly RIM will be a stronger company by the end of this current quarter.  Believe me when I say that no one at the top took this decision lightly.  In fact, I would go out on limb and tell you that even Jim Balsilie and Mike Laziridis lost sleep over this.  I have coached executives through this kind of thing before and the ones that suffer the most are those that built the company with their own hands (i.e. founders, entrepreneurs).   In my opinion, both Mike and Jim will try their hardest for this not to happen again.  It does not feel good and it penetrates to the deepest parts of a founder’s ego.  In some ways they may even perceive this as their own personal failure.

Regardless of your opinion of them – Mike and Jim have worked very hard over the years and have sacrificed much on the personal side as well.  How much they sacrificed only those closest to them really know.   Bottom line – this is not easy for anyone.  It goes to the core of an organization’s heart… and everybody hurts.  Everybody.

Unfortunately as humans we sometimes need big shakeups to bring about true change.  We need to be shocked out of complacency and comfort zones in order for us to bring up our game.

So far the execution of the ‘changes’ has hit among other areas sales, marketing and product management.  Of course, as an outsider I do not have complete visibility into what is going on and I am sure there are other areas being affected.  My hope is that these folks are not merely scapegoats but that RIM will truly use this time to refocus and leverage the enormous talent and capacity that is still in house.

I left RIM three years ago and I have only good memories from my time there.  Although today my main device at work is the BlackBerry Torch I do have an iPhone and a Samsung Galaxy S at home and my work Playbook is on order (I actually just returned my iPad so I could have a Playbook instead).  Despite all of its shortcoming I still consider my Blackberry an invaluable productivity tool for work.  But here’s the catch – I only use 3 applications outside of email, contacts and calendaring (LinkedIn, Twitter and Globe and Mail Politics).  For anything else I use my wife’s iPhone or my Android device.

So I close this post and this week with RIM in my mind and on my heart.  I want to firmly position myself in the corner of those that believe that RIM is NOT dead.  If all goes well Research In Motion will be a stronger company by next quarter and will release new products and services that will enable them get back on track.

Do you want to know what RIM’s secret weapon is?  Even today the BlackBerry platform differentiates itself from all others through its BlackBerry Enterprise Server and the thousands of implementations.  If there is one player that can instantly dominate the Mobile Device Management space in one swoop is RIM.  With their acquisition of Ubitexx they should be able to get there relatively soon.  Will write a separate post on this early next week.

Of course all the hopes reflected in this post are also predicated on my belief that RIM will refresh its devices with QNX to the point  of making them more competitive and that their product design and release cycles will be compressed and enable them to come to market faster.

{ 0 comments }

Contactless Payments and Barclaycard

  Posted via email from Mobile Strategy

July 20, 2011 Read the full article →

Freedom In Mobility

The criticism (more like the complaint) we hear a lot these days has to do with our ‘over-connectedness.’ We are told that people are too connected… That it is interfering with personal lives and affecting our quality of life. Really? Is it technology’s fault or is it our inability to say no to technology that [...]

July 19, 2011 Read the full article →

Are Mobile Apps Disposable?

Another way of posing this question is ‘should mobile apps be considered disposable?’ The answer is no. If your mobile strategy is such that you are considering putting something (ie. an app) together as a quick fix to coming into the game late … then you really don’t have a mobile strategy. Please don’t build [...]

July 19, 2011 Read the full article →

How Smart is your Smartphone?

How smart is your Smartphone? No… but really. How smart is it? As smart as the applications? As smart as the user? As smart as the designers? Or does it depend on something else?

March 19, 2011 Read the full article →

Growth of Android Video

Just a neat perspective on it.  Enjoy. Found it at MobileSyrup Originally from pestaola.gr

March 5, 2011 Read the full article →

Mobile Operators Respond to Global Trends

Déjà vu with data growth We have been here before. Data traffic already exceeds voice on many mobile networks. And it is predicted to increase 1000-fold within a decade as wireless becomes the world’s primary method of Internet access. A massive surge in fixed network traffic started approximately 15 years ago. Data surpassed and then [...]

February 26, 2011 Read the full article →